Peakbin selection in mass spectrometry data using a consensus approach with estimation of distribution algorithms

Revision as of 16:24, 25 February 2020 by Bwday (talk | contribs) (Created page with "__NUMBEREDHEADINGS__ === Citation === Armananzas R, Saeys Y, Inza I, Garcia-Torres M, Bielza C, Van de Peer Y, Larranaga P. Peakbin selection in mass spectrometry data using a...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

1 Citation

Armananzas R, Saeys Y, Inza I, Garcia-Torres M, Bielza C, Van de Peer Y, Larranaga P. Peakbin selection in mass spectrometry data using a consensus approach with estimation of distribution algorithms. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics. 2010 Mar 25;8(3):760-74.

Permanent link to the paper


2 Summary

Briefly describe the scope of the paper, i.e. the field of research and/or application.

3 Study outcomes

List the paper results concerning method comparison and benchmarking:

3.1 Outcome O1

The performance of ...

Outcome O1 is presented as Figure X in the original publication.

3.2 Outcome O2

...

Outcome O2 is presented as Figure X in the original publication.

3.3 Outcome On

...

Outcome On is presented as Figure X in the original publication.

3.4 Further outcomes

If intended, you can add further outcomes here.


4 Study design and evidence level

4.1 General aspects

You can describe general design aspects here. The study designs for describing specific outcomes are listed in the following subsections:

4.2 Design for Outcome O1

  • The outcome was generated for ...
  • Configuration parameters were chosen ...
  • ...

4.3 Design for Outcome O2

  • The outcome was generated for ...
  • Configuration parameters were chosen ...
  • ...

...

4.4 Design for Outcome O

  • The outcome was generated for ...
  • Configuration parameters were chosen ...
  • ...

5 Further comments and aspects

6 References

The list of cited or related literature is placed here.