Microbiome differential abundance methods produce different results across 38 datasets

Revision as of 14:33, 18 February 2022 by Ckreutz (talk | contribs) (Created page with "__NUMBEREDHEADINGS__ === Citation === Nearing, J. T., Douglas, G. M., Hayes, M. G., MacDonald, J., Desai, D. K., Allward, N., ... & Langille, M. G. (2022). Microbiome differen...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

1 Citation

Nearing, J. T., Douglas, G. M., Hayes, M. G., MacDonald, J., Desai, D. K., Allward, N., ... & Langille, M. G. (2022). Microbiome differential abundance methods produce different results across 38 datasets. Nature Communications, 13(1), 1-16.

Permanent link to the paper


2 Summary

Briefly describe the scope of the paper, i.e. the field of research and/or application.

3 Study outcomes

List the paper results concerning method comparison and benchmarking:

3.1 Outcome O1

The performance of ...

Outcome O1 is presented as Figure X in the original publication.

3.2 Outcome O2

...

Outcome O2 is presented as Figure X in the original publication.

3.3 Outcome On

...

Outcome On is presented as Figure X in the original publication.

3.4 Further outcomes

If intended, you can add further outcomes here.


4 Study design and evidence level

4.1 General aspects

You can describe general design aspects here. The study designs for describing specific outcomes are listed in the following subsections:

4.2 Design for Outcome O1

  • The outcome was generated for ...
  • Configuration parameters were chosen ...
  • ...

4.3 Design for Outcome O2

  • The outcome was generated for ...
  • Configuration parameters were chosen ...
  • ...

...

4.4 Design for Outcome O

  • The outcome was generated for ...
  • Configuration parameters were chosen ...
  • ...

5 Further comments and aspects

6 References

The list of cited or related literature is placed here.