Difference between revisions of "Comparison of metaheuristic strategies for peakbin selection in proteomic mass spectrometry data"
(Created page with "__NUMBEREDHEADINGS__ === Citation === García-Torres M, Armañanzas R, Bielza C, Larrañaga P. Comparison of metaheuristic strategies for peakbin selection in proteomic mass s...") |
(No difference)
|
Latest revision as of 16:29, 25 February 2020
Contents
1 Citation
García-Torres M, Armañanzas R, Bielza C, Larrañaga P. Comparison of metaheuristic strategies for peakbin selection in proteomic mass spectrometry data. Information Sciences. 2013 Feb 10;222:229-46.
2 Summary
Briefly describe the scope of the paper, i.e. the field of research and/or application.
3 Study outcomes
List the paper results concerning method comparison and benchmarking:
3.1 Outcome O1
The performance of ...
Outcome O1 is presented as Figure X in the original publication.
3.2 Outcome O2
...
Outcome O2 is presented as Figure X in the original publication.
3.3 Outcome On
...
Outcome On is presented as Figure X in the original publication.
3.4 Further outcomes
If intended, you can add further outcomes here.
4 Study design and evidence level
4.1 General aspects
You can describe general design aspects here. The study designs for describing specific outcomes are listed in the following subsections:
4.2 Design for Outcome O1
- The outcome was generated for ...
- Configuration parameters were chosen ...
- ...
4.3 Design for Outcome O2
- The outcome was generated for ...
- Configuration parameters were chosen ...
- ...
...
4.4 Design for Outcome O
- The outcome was generated for ...
- Configuration parameters were chosen ...
- ...
5 Further comments and aspects
6 References
The list of cited or related literature is placed here.