Search results
- ...ne set analysis methods: a systematic comparison, 2018, BioData mining, 11(1), 8. ...nal publication for the prostate data template and in the "Additional File 1" for the other templates.7 KB (938 words) - 13:54, 25 February 2020
- ...ls of high-density oligonucleotide SNP array data. Biostatistics. 2007 Apr 1;8(2):485-99.2 KB (196 words) - 09:42, 25 February 2020
- ...enome-Scale Biochemical Reaction Networks]. PLoS computational biology, 13(1), e1005331.355 bytes (39 words) - 11:57, 25 February 2020
- ...issues and methodological solutions. Briefings in bioinformatics. 2015 Nov 1;16(6):974-86.2 KB (205 words) - 10:22, 25 February 2020
- ...ion of miRNA-seq data preprocessing. Briefings in bioinformatics. 2015 Nov 1;16(6):950-63.1 KB (190 words) - 10:05, 25 February 2020
- Outcome O1 is presented as Figure 1 in the original publication. ...umber of parameters) are randomly generated with -0.1 > p<sub>i</sub> > -1.1.6 KB (918 words) - 15:20, 25 February 2020
- ...a the number of missing values highly depends on peptide intensity (Figure 1)2 KB (241 words) - 11:49, 25 February 2020
- 1. The optimization-based approaches: in which a parameter is fixed and are o3 KB (480 words) - 14:48, 25 February 2020
- a comparative study and two selection schemes. BMC Bioinformatics, 9(1):12.2 KB (206 words) - 11:41, 25 February 2020
- ...global optimum than a single shooting approach, as can be seen from Figure 1 and 2 in the original publication. However, this comes at the cost of incre ...red to the alternatives in the two tested models, which is listed in Table 1 and Table 2 and demonstrated in Figure 3 in the publication.2 KB (338 words) - 14:08, 26 February 2020
- * Only chromosome 1 was analyzed because of huge computation times10 KB (1,483 words) - 11:38, 25 February 2020
- ...hree replicates and by randomly permute over samples for each CgG (termed "1. permutation" below), the following performance was observed: * Only regions with at least 3 CpGs and at least 0.1 for the "mean methylation level" were considered as DMRs.6 KB (952 words) - 11:38, 25 February 2020
- Outcome O1 is presented as Venn diagram in Figure 1 of the original publication. ...s (except FET with cutoff=13.8) fail for the setting "pseudo gene set with 1-2 strongly associated SNPs4 KB (639 words) - 13:03, 25 February 2020
- * Four different parallelization levels (1 vs. 2 cores, 1 vs. 4, 1 vs. 8, and 1 vs. 16)5 KB (617 words) - 11:52, 25 February 2020
- ...s data analysis. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry. 2015 Jan 15;29(1):119-27.2 KB (199 words) - 13:02, 25 February 2020
- ...for high-throughput quantitative RT-PCR. BMC bioinformatics. 2009 Dec 1;10(1):110.2 KB (200 words) - 13:29, 25 February 2020
- ...g methods for predictive proteomics. Briefings in bioinformatics. 2008 Mar 1;9(2):119-28.1 KB (196 words) - 13:46, 25 February 2020
- ...model improves accuracy, depth of discovery and internal coverage (Figures 1,2,3) ...n,Svd,Knn), which rely on interblock information, on all datasets (Figures 1,2,3)2 KB (244 words) - 14:33, 2 February 2021
- ...are platform for high-throughput glycomics. Analytical chemistry. 2009 May 1;81(9):3252-60.1 KB (188 words) - 13:58, 25 February 2020
- Alternatively, steps 1.-3. might be replaced by a single global test. ...with different levels of differential expression (delta \in {0, 0.75, 1, -1}) were simulated6 KB (854 words) - 15:40, 25 February 2020